|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Dusky salamander
|
|
Desmognathus fuscus
|
|
ITIS Species Code: 173633
NatureServ Element Code: AAAAD03040
|
|
|
|
Amphibia | Caudata | Plethodontidae
|
| NatureServe Global Rank: |
NatureServe State (NC) Rank: | |
| | Federal Status: |
NC State Status: | |
| |
|
|
|
|
HEXAGONAL KNOWN RANGE: | PREDICTED DISTRIBUTION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY OF STATEWIDE PREDICTED DISTRIBUTION: |
| | Land Unit |
| US Fish & Wildlife Service | US Forest Service | US National Park Service
| US Department of Defense | NC State Parks |
NC University System | NC Wildlife Res. Com. | NC Forest Service |
NC Div. of Coastal Mgmt. | Local Governments | Non-Governmental Org. |
Other Public Lands | Private Lands |
| GAP Status 1-2
| All Protected Lands | Statewide |
|
| Hectares |
|
1,294.29 | 36,112.05 | 6,879.24 |
11,148.57 | 2,641.41 | 802.08 |
9,367.20 | 538.08 | 0.00 |
1,535.31 | 1,227.33 | 233.82 |
586,581.21 |
| 26,013.48 | 69,624.33
| 658,360.59
| | | Acres |
|
3,198.26 | 89,234.80 | 16,998.97 |
27,548.71 | 6,527.06 | 1,981.98 |
23,146.85 | 1,841.43 | 0.00 |
3,793.83 | 3,032.80 | 577.78 |
1,449,473.45 |
| 64,792.50 | 172,557.24
| 1,627,355.94
|
| % of Dist. on |
Prot. Lands |
|
1.9 % | 51.9 % |
7.3 % | 16.0 % |
3.8 % | 1.2 % |
13.3 % | 0.8 % |
0.0 % | 1.6 % |
1.6 % | 0.2 % |
0.0 % |
| 37.4
% | ----- | ----- |
|
% of Dist. on | All Lands |
|
0.2 % | 5.5 % |
1.0 % | 1.7 % |
0.4 % | 0.1 % |
1.4 % | < 0.1 % |
0.0 % | 0.2 % |
0.2 % | < 0.1 % |
89.1 % |
| 4.0
% | ----- | ----- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HABITAT DESCRIPTION: |
|
The salamander's range in North Carolina includes the piedmont, portions of the upper coastal plain and some northeastern mountain counties (Martof et al. 1980). NATURE SERVE GLOBAL HABITAT COMMENTS: Rock-strewn woodland streams, seepages, and springs in north; floodplains, sloughs, and mucky sites along upland streams in south.
Usually near running or trickling water. Hides under leaves, rocks, or other objects in or near water, or in burrows. In New York, distribution apparently is influenced by soil pH (Wyman 1988). Eggs are laid near water under moss (e.g., in Tennessee; see Hom 1988) or rocks, in logs, and in stream-bank cavities. Larval stage usually aquatic.
|
|
|
MODELING DESCRIPTION: |
| Occupied Landcover Map Units: |
| Code |
Name | Description |
NC Natural Heritage Program Equivalent |
380 | Coastal Plain Fresh Water Emergent
|
Emergent vegetation in fresh water seepage bogs, ponds and riverbeds of the coastal plain. Includes alliances dominated by sedges, eelgrass, as well as cane found in unforested cane-brakes.
|
Small Depression Pond, Sandhill Seep, Floodplain Pool, Unforested Floodplain Canebrake, Riverscour Prairies, Vernal Pools
|
50 | Coastal Plain Mixed Bottomland Forests
|
Includes forests dominated by a variety of hardwood species, including sweetgum, cottonwood, red maple.
|
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood (in part), Coastal Plain Levee Forest
|
49 | Coastal Plain Oak Bottomland Forest
|
Bottomland forests dominated by deciduous oak alliances. Oaks represented can include swamp chestnut, cherrybark, willow, and/or overcup oak. Inclusions of loblolly pine temporarily flooded forests occur in patches. Hydrology is temporarily to seasonally flooded.
|
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods (in part) blackwater subtype, brownwater subtype
|
158 | Coastal Plain Nonriverine Wet Flat Forests
|
Loblolly pine - Atlantic white-cedar - red maple - swamp tupelo saturated forests as well as forests dominated by loblolly, sweetgum, and red maple in non-riverine flats.
|
Non-riverine Wet Hardwood Forest
|
15 | Seepage and Streamhead Swamps
|
Includes extensive peat flats in the coastal plain, dominated by swamp tupelo, maples, and Atlantic white cedar alliances. In the sandhills includes streamhead pond pine and bay forests alliances. Saturated hydrology.
|
Bay Forest, Small Depression Pocosin, Streamhead Atlantic White Cedar Forest, Streamhead Pocosins
|
385 | Oak Bottomland Forest and Swamp Forest
|
The swamp chestnut oak, cherrybark oak, shumard oak and sweetgum alliance is one representative. Other alliances are dominated by water, willow, and overcup oaks. Swamp forests can be dominated by sweetgum, red maple, and black gum being dominant.
Loblolly can occur in combination with sweetgum and red maple, or with tulip poplar. Includes saturated and semi- to permanently flooded forests in the mountains.
|
Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest, Piedmont/Mountain Swamp Forest
|
63 | Coastal Plain Mesic Hardwood Forests
|
Beech dominated forests with white oak and northern red oak as possible co-dominants. Dry-mesic to mesic forests on slopes and small stream bottoms in the coastal plain.
|
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest, Basic Mesic Forests
|
67 | Wet Longleaf or Slash Pine Savanna
|
Wet flatwoods and pine savannas, typically dominated by longleaf pines, but slash or pond pines may be the dominant pines.
|
Wet Pine Flatwoods
|
97 | Mesic Longleaf Pine
|
Longleaf pine woodlands without a major scrub oak component. Slash or loblolly pines may be present as well.
|
Mesic Pine Flatwoods
|
238 | Piedmont/Mountain Submerged Aquatic Vegetation
|
Seasonally to permanently flooded areas with aquatic vegetation. Waterlily, pondweed, hydrilla smartweed are a few of the species that can occur.
|
Piedmont/Mountain Semipermanent Impoundment (in part)
|
239 | Piedmont/Mountain Emergent Vegetation
|
Emergent vegetation of all wetland hydrologies. Sites would commonly support species such as tussock sedge, rushs, and cattail alliances.
|
Rocky Bar and Shore (in part)
|
269 | Floodplain Wet Shrublands
|
Saturated shrublands of the Piedmont, includes buttonbush, swamp-loosestrife, decodon and alders.
|
Piedmont/mountain Semipermanent Impoundment
|
230 | Piedmont Mesic Forest
|
American Beech - Red Oak - White Oak Forests.
|
Mesic Mixed Hardwood
|
384 | Piedmont/Mountain Mixed Bottomland Hardwood Forests
|
Includes temporarily to seasonally forests dominated by hardwood species. Hardwoods include sweetgum, red maple, sycamore which co-occur in a mosaic of bottomland and levee positions. Includes alluvial hardwood forests in the mountains. Hemlock and white pine may occur as inclusions, but are generally mapped separately.
|
Piedmont/Mountain Alluvial Forest, Piedmont/Mountain Levee Forest
|
8 | Open water
|
Open water without aquatic vegetation.
|
No equivalent
|
517 | Hemlock Floodplain Forest
|
Alluvial forest with hemlock and/or white pine in mountains and western piedmont. Hydrology is generally temporarily to seasonally flooded.
|
Canada Hemlock Forest
|
522 | Northern Hardwoods
|
High Elevation forests including yellow birch, American beech, and yellow buckeye. Includes forests with Hemlock and Yellow Birch.
|
Northern Hardwoods Forest, Boulderfield Forest
|
525 | Appalachian Oak Forest
|
A variety of oak forest types including Black, White, Scarlet Oaks in dry to mesic situations. Includes forests historically co-dominated by American Chestnut.
|
High Elevation Red Oak Forest, Montane White Oak Forest
|
526 | Appalachian Cove Forest
|
Mixed Mesophytic forests of the mountains. Includes tuliptree, basswood, yellow buckeye and surgar maple. This class is mapped to include cove forests dominated or co-dominated by hemlock.
|
Rich Cove Forest, Acidic Cove Forest
|
527 | Appalachian Hemlock
|
Upland hemlock forests of the moutains region. Vary from side slopes to steep slope positions.
|
Canada Hemlock Forest
|
533 | Appalachian Swamp Forest
|
Evergreen and deciduous forests with saturated hydrologies. This class may contain a variety of trees species, including hemlock - red maple, pitch pine, and white pine forests.
|
Swamp Forest-Bog Complex, Southern Appalachian Bog, Southern Appalachian Fen
|
534 | Appalachian Wet Shrubland/ Herbaceous
|
Saturated shrubs and herbaceous vegetation. Often mapped as an inclusion in Appalachian Swamp Forest.
|
Southern Appalachian Bog, Southern Appalachian Fen
|
|
| View Entire Landcover Legend |
|
|
Additional Spatial Constraints: |
| Exclude all area outside of known range. |
| Exclude all land greater than 50 meters from an open water feature. |
| Exclude all land greater than 50 meters from wet vegetation. |
| Exclude all water greater than 50 meters from land. |
|
CITATIONS: |
|
Hom, C. L. 1988. Cover object choice by female dusky salamanders, DESMOGNATHUS FUSCUS. J. Herpetol. 22:247-249.
Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians:eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
Folkerts, G. W. 1968. The genus DESMOGNATHUS Baird (Amphibia:Plethodontidae) in Alabama. Ph.D. diss., Auburn Univ., Auburn, Alabama. 129 pp.
Tilley, S. G. 1988. Hybridization between two species of DESMOGNATHUS (Amphibia:Caudata:Plethodontidae) in the Great Smoky Mountains. Herpetol. Monogr. 2:27-39.
Redmond, W. H., and A. F. Scott. 1996. Atlas of amphibians in Tennessee. The Center for Field Biology, Austin Peay State University, Miscellaneous Publication Number 12. v + 94 pp.
Wyman, R. L. 1988. Soil acidity and moisture and the distribution of amphibians in five forests of southcentral New York. Copeia 1988:394-399.
Means, D. B., and A. A. Karlin. 1989. A new species of DESMOGNATHUS from the eastern Gulf Coastal Plain. Herpetologica 45:37-46.
Barbour, R. W. 1971. Amphibians and reptiles of Kentucky. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington. x + 334 pp.
Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.
Conant, R. 1975. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America. Second Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xvii + 429 pp.
Mount, R. H. 1975. The Reptiles and Amphibians of Alabama. Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama. vii + 347 pp.
Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
Martof, B. S., W. M. Palmer, J. R. Bailey, and J. R. Harrison, III. 1980. Amphibians and reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 264 pp.
DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1983. Amphibians and reptiles of New England. Habitats and natural history. Univ. Massachusetts Press. vii + 83 pp.
Karlin, A. A., and S. I. Guttman. 1986. Systematics and geographic isozyme variation in the plethodontid salamander DESMOGNATHUS FUSCUS (Rafinesque). Herpetologica 42:282-301.
Green, N. B., and T. K. Pauley. 1987. Amphibians and reptiles in West Virginia. University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. xi + 241 pp.
Hom, C. L. 1987. Reproductive ecology of female dusky salamanders, DESMOGNATHUS FUSCUS (Plethodontidae), in the southern Appalachians. Copeia 1987:768-777.
Kamstra, J. 1991. Rediscovery of the northern dusky salamander, DESMOGNATHUS F. FUSCUS, in Ontario. Can. Field-Nat. 105:561-563.
|
|
|
10 March 2005 |
|
This data was compiled and/or developed
by the North Carolina GAP Analysis Project.
For more information please contact them at: NC-GAP Analysis Project Dept. of Zoology, NCSU Campus Box 7617 Raleigh, NC 27695-7617 (919) 513-2853
www.basic.ncsu.edu/ncgap |